The title of the article, Learning About Literacy A 30-Year Journey is exactly that. Authors David Pearson and Diane Stephens begin their expedition in the early 1960’s and drop off somewhere in the mid-nineties leaving its audiences inundated with scholarly theories, questionable practices, and policy reforms.
Spearheading the 30-year journey begins with the linguists. Linguists believed reading was a language process. Linguists explored language learning within the context of individuals own oral and written expressions. In and around the height of the linguist movement Dr. Noam Chomsky theorized the transformation of language structures. Citing evidence that language comprehension could not be attributed to the cluster of like words in a sentence. Rather he believed people were wired to acquire language in the environment where they lived.
The next main emphasis of study discovered youngsters inventing their own rules about how they perceived oral language. In other words, children were active participants in their own language. Making up their own rules; adding and or omitting sounds on the end of words or using the wrong tense of a verb.
Another perspective into language acquisition, that I use quite often can be based upon the three cue systems. Semantic cues inferring clues within reading, syntactic cues made up of word rules, patterns and grammar and graph phonemes the recognition of letters, sound to letter relationship and letter to sound correspondence. This approach followed a “hands-on” method. Children being the revolutionaries behind their own reading!
One of the most highlighted perspectives from the research evolves from the Psychological point of view of learning. The highly acclaimed schema theory states that all knowledge is organized into units which then goes into memory storage. Schemata represent knowledge relating to objects and the relationship with those particular objects. Connecting one schema to another stores information and strengthens comprehension skills. Building new knowledge on top of previous knowledge is a practice I use and have used for quite some time. The active and mindful approach allows students to identify relationships, causes and reinforces critical thinking skills in readers.
One of my favorite takeaways from the research poses questions that invite debate, unsettledness sprinkled with a bit of inspiration that could quite possibly continue the 30-year journey. One particular example of contention relates to assessment. On one end I acknowledge the need for meaningful authentic assessment and on the other end swallowing the current testing models that are used in some educational settings feel irrelevant and unworthy of the testee. Although a topic as such is of course not objective rather quite subjective. I deem it highly necessary to ensure the assessment reflects a diverse collection of student works. Collaborating with colleagues, using both formal and informal means of assessment in addition to creating a portfolio of instruction correlating to what the student is being tested on.

